![CChavez](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b6201_7023de364ff14512b4e9065811079af4~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_170,h_161,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_auto/CChavez.png)
Jennifer Celaya
Running for:
Supervisor District 2
Campaign Website:
1) PAC*SJ recently released its second annual “Endangered Eight” list of the most threatened historic places in San José. Which of these places (including those from our 2022 “Endangered Eight” of which some remain endangered) most resonates with you personally? Which of these would you use the power of your elected office to address, and how?
All of the Endangered Eight list resonates with me because I grew up seeing these historic buildings it was part of my up bringing and seeing them preserved and protected is what I will fight for. Taking out our historic places in San Jose will remove history and memories that make San Jose what it is.
2) Is there a historic place or preservation issue not on our 2022 or 2023 “Endangered Eight” lists that you would nominate to be added? If so, what solutions would you offer as an elected official to address the issue/threat?
Not at this time
3) In the past three years alone, at least six vacant historic buildings in San José have been lost to fire, and many more have suffered from chronic neglect and vandalism. Often, these properties were left vacant after former tenants were displaced in anticipation of future development that never materialized. How would you propose more effective code enforcement and security measures to encourage better stewardship and to prevent the continued loss of our historic resources to neglect? What additional solutions would you propose to address these systemic problems?
I would put a progressive plan in place that will ensure the protection and security of these valuable historic buildings would be top priority and that code enforcement is held accountable for any loss. Making sure that all code enforcement and security measures are being executed.
4) Do you believe the County should require compensatory mitigation fees and/or surety bonds from developers who request and receive entitlements to alter or demolish historic resources under County jurisdiction? If such policies are instituted and enforced, how would you like to see those funds directed?
Yes I do and believe the funds should be directed towards Historic resources
5) The County has long acknowledged that its Heritage Resource Inventory-- a countywide survey of historic sites intended to proactively guide development decisions-- is incomplete and out-of-date. Do you support increased County funding and staffing levels to ensure that the HRI is an up-to-date and effective planning tool for communities and developers alike?
Yes
6) Santa Clara County has yet to receive final approval for its State-mandated Housing Element, and is therefore currently subject to the “Builder’s Remedy” law requiring streamlined approval of otherwise non-conforming residential development projects in unincorporated areas of the County. How would you help ensure that citizens continue to have a voice in developments that might threaten the character and livability of their neighborhoods, particularly if there are historic resources at risk?
I would create an community board that will create oversight and community to be apart of the decsion making prior to any approval.
7) County park lands are a critical resource for the people of San José and are potential receiver sites for distinctive historic buildings that must be relocated to make way for new developments. Would you support this as a mitigation measure for new developments with historic resources that would otherwise be demolished? How do you envision that these resources could be best utilized within the parks for the benefit of the public?
Yes I would support . It would be a great contribution to the public to display Santa Clara County's History and give our youth the ability to take part in historic preservation.
8) Santa Clara County has owned and maintained the historic but vacant Former San Jose City Hall since 2005. In 2022, County Supervisors voted unanimously to reject the building’s proposed demolition and directed staff to explore adaptive reuse options. Do you support this decision? Would you support a proposal to convert the building for housing or any other adaptive reuse? Why or why not?
I would like to preserve the historic city hall building. Converting it into housing would take away its historic value.
9) What role do you believe that historic preservation should play in creating and sustaining a vibrant and culturally diverse future for Santa Clara County? Is there a particular project or effort you have undertaken or would propose to undertake--either professionally or personally-- that best embodies your vision for historic preservation in Santa Clara County?
I believe that historic preservation is very important and plays a key role in protecting our history in Santa Clara County and should be a priority. I would like to create a project but with the input, direction of PAC*SJ